The Thing
Summary
If John Carpenter ’s legendaryThe Thingis pass away to get a revitalisation , it should follow the blueprint set byPrey . Released in 2022,Preywas a shot in the arm for thePredatorfranchise . While the film embrace the fundamental element of thesci - fi action at law filmsthat come before it , it also reinvigorate the premise by shift nidus to a aboriginal American tribe in the 17th - century northerly wilds . It was a ingenious mind , utilizing core concepts and iconic aspects of the franchise while search it from a sweet position .
Preywas a terrific idea for a film , with the simple act of relocating the narration reinvigorating thePredatorfranchise . This success could easily be translate to otherhorror / sci - fi moviesin search of a new direction that alsohonors the elements that made them successfulin the first place . There ’s one plastic film in particular that could benefit from a similar approach . In fact , it might be the best way for the enfranchisement to return to the big - screen and still find fresh .
John Carpenter ’s The Thing is a sci - fi horror chef-d’oeuvre that still holds up today – but there are a few minor flaws that stick out on rewatches .
The Thing Should Use Prey’s Blueprint For A Successful Revival
The Thingfranchise should attempt to learn fromPrey ’s successand apply it to their succeeding entries in the serial . base on John W. Campbell Jr. novellaWho Goes There?(which also inspire 1951’sThe Thing From Another World ) , all three versions ofThe Thingfocus on the nominal alien life variety . Frozen for centuries until being let out by humans in Antarctica , the animate being replicates subsist being . As it spreads through the group , the surviving humans are task with envision out what it is and how to stop it — all while combat their own fears and paranoia .
It ’s a great and quietly adaptable construct , one that could potentially work in numerous configurations . However , the affair has n’t really gotten the chance to raise that . Instead , both adaptations of Campbell Jr. ’s taradiddle ( as well as the2011 prequelto John Carpenter ’s film , also titledThe Thing ) have stay firmly locked in their modern position . Instead , there might be a greatThingmoviethat relocates the threat and changes the focus , post the upshot in a far upstage past tense and forcing a less technologically advanced mathematical group to face an unknowable and unvanquishable terror .
The Thingis now uncommitted for digital leverage from Vudu , Apple TV , and Prime Video .
The ’80s Sci-Fi Horror Movie Already Has The Perfect Story For A Prequel Movie
In fact , there ’s already a tie - in comic that highlights how wellThe Thingwould translate to other fourth dimension - periods and options or else of following up onthe ending ofThe Thing . The Thing : The Northman Nightmare(by Steve Niles , Patric Reynolds , Dave Stewart , Nate Piekos , and Blambot!)takes target centuries before the events of the other moving-picture show . The story focuses on a group of Norsemen traversing through the frozen landscape painting of Greenland . However , they encounter a shapeshifting and forever conform creature in a desolate settlement . The story retains the raw tension and revulsion that comes from the assumption ofThe Thing .
However , by relocating the natural action and news report to the aloof past , The Northman Nightmareis capable to infuse the concept with unique elements thatbring a sense of impudent scourge to the intimate idea . The Northman Nightmaretakes aside the technological rise that Mac and his allies can rely on inThe matter , giving the story a harsher and more desperate edge . It prepare the horror all the more unknowable and exotic . A news report likeThe Northman Nightmarehighlights the element that makeThe Thingwork so well , and how adaptable it is in terms of gear up .
The Thing ’s eye gleam theory offers some fully grown clue as to which reference are infected during the story , but exactly how in effect is this method ?
A team of researchers set out to study an alien spacecraft found in Antarctica, where they also discover an alien body on the site. The alien buried in ice is actually alive and has the ability to imitate human form. The group must find a way to distinguish who the real person is from The Thing and stay alive. John Carpenter’s 1982 film is a remake of 1951’s The Thing from Another World and stars Kurt Russel as the hero RJ MacReady.
Why The Thing Needs A Prequel More Than A Sequel
This was what sunk the critically maligned 2011The affair , as it was too indebted to the pilot to feel unparalleled . shift the focal point toanother time period and setting is a natural fix , just asPreybreathed young life into thePredatorfranchise by shifting the focus and style to a different stop . It allows for a coarse-grained and ground take on a sci - fi classic , with a dangerous physical boundary . Any prospective follow - up toThe Thingshould check the right lessons fromPreyand sample to reimagine the story from a new linear perspective and new time period .
Your Rating
Your input has not been economise
Cast
A team of researchers set out to study an alien spacecraft institute in Antarctica , where they also discover an foreign body on the site . The extraterrestrial being buried in ice is in reality live and has the power to imitate human form . The group must find oneself a way to distinguish who the real person is from The Thing and stay live . John Carpenter ’s 1982 moving picture is a remake of 1951 ’s The Thing from Another World and stars Kurt Russel as the hero RJ MacReady .
